what are two differences between meiosis and mitosis

s Summary: Mitosis ‘“ separation of chromosomes into two identical sets of daughter cells Meiosis- reductional cell division and the number of chromosomes is divided into half; it is essential for sexual reproduction, and therefore it occurs in eukaryotes Find more information on Mitosis and Meiosis.

Difference Between Mitosis and Meiosis

"Difference Between Mitosis and Meiosis• Categorized under Science | Difference Between Mitosis and Meiosis Mitosis vs Meiosis

Meiosis and Mitosis describe cell division in eukaryotic cells when the chromosome separates. In mitosis chromosomes separates and form into two identical sets of daughter nuclei, and it is followed by cytokinesis (division of cytoplasm). Basically, in mitosis the mother cell divides into two daughter cells which are genetically identical to each other and to the parent cell.

Phases of mitosis include:1. Interface -where cell prepares for cell division and it also includes three other phases such as G1 (growth), S (synthesis), and G2 (second gap) 2. Prophase ‘“ formation of centrosomes, condensation of chromatin 3. Prometaphase- degradation of the nuclear membrane, attachment of microtubules to kinetochores 4. Metaphase- alignment of chromosomes at the metaphase plate 5. Early anaphase- shortening of kinetochore microtubules 6. Telophase- de-condensation of chromosomes and surrounded by nuclear membranes, formation of cleavage furrow. 7. Cytokinesis- division of cytoplasm

Meiosis is a reductional cell division where the number of chromosomes is divided into half. Gametes formations occur in animal cell and meiosis is necessary for sexual reproduction which occurs in eukaryotes. Meiosis influence stable sexual reproduction by halving of ploidy or chromosome count.

Without meiosis the fertilization would result in zygote with twice the number of the parent. Phases of meiosis include:1. Meiosis I ‘“ separation of homologous chromosomes and production of two haploid cells (23 chromosomes, N in humans) 2. Prophase I ‘“ pairing of homologous chromosome pair and recombination (crossing over) occurs 3. Metaphase I – Homologous pairs move along the metaphase plate, kinetochore microtubules from both centrioles attach to the homologous chromosomes align along an equatorial plane. 4. Anaphase I – shortening of microtubules, pulling of chromosomes toward opposing poles, forming two haploid sets 5. Telophase I – arrival of chromosomes to the poles with each daughter cell containing half the number of chromosomes 6. Meiosis II – second part of the meiotic process with the production of four haploid cells from the two haploid cell

Search Difference Between.net : Custom Search Help us improve. Rate this post! ( 29 votes, average: 3.72 out of 5)Email This Post : If you like this article or our site. Please spread the word. Share it with your friends/family. Difference Between Meiosis 1 and Meiosis 2Difference Between Haploid and Diploid Difference Between Meiosis 2 and Mitosis Difference between Meiosis in males and females Difference Between Body cells and Gametes Difference Between Chromosome and Chromatid Difference Between Cytokinesis and Mitosis Cite sharmila. ""Difference Between Mitosis and Meiosis."" Difference Between.net. October 7, 2009 < http://www.differencebetween.net/science/difference-between-mitosis-and-meiosis/ >. "


what age was martin luther king when he was admitted

If it was not for Benjamin Mays... Benjamin Mays was the president of Morehouse College in Atlanta when he met Martin Luther King, Jr. In 1944, Martin Luther King was admitted to the college at age 15. Mays became so close to Martin Luther King, Jr., that later in life he referred to King “as a son” and would go on to deliver the eulogy at King’s funeral. Being the son of slaves gave Mays the drive to succeed and continue to strive in higher education.

"Dr. Martin L. King, Jr. and His Mentors: A Message for America Today Published on January 15, 2015Sign in to like this article61Sign in to comment on this article17Share2Dr. Ernest H. Johnson Follow Sign in to follow this author Advocate for the Equitable Education of Children of Color As we prepare to celebrate the Martin Luther King, Jr. national holiday, leaders across America might consider an often overlooked leadership and life lesson that this famous protégé taught us: mentors help shape the accomplishments of their protégés’ and sometimes those protégés change the world!“Life’s most persistent and urgent question is, ‘What are you doing for others?’ ” These are the words of Martin Luther King, Jr. As we celebrate his life and legacy on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, consider mentoring some young people in 2015. Take a few moments to reflect on the impact that Dr. King’s mentors had on his life. While the protégés’ you take on might not be destined to become civil rights leaders, with you they have a greater chance of perusing their dreams. For me, I am resolving to mentor more young males in 2015. If you want to know my reasons, then look at my pervious posts.

He went on to be the dean of the school of Religion at Howard University in 1934, where he met Howard Thurman, also a professor there. It was Thurman who urged Mays to travel to India to meet Gandhi. In 1940, he became president of Morehouse College in 1940 where four years later he would become the mentor to a remarkable 15-year old Black boy, Martin Luther King, Jr. Over the course of his short life, Dr. King changed the face of American society, and his courage and compassion for humanity are an inspiration to millions of people. Many know King was a follower of Mahatma Gandhi and the concept of non-violent resistance, but Dr. King never met Gandhi. If it was not for one his mentors, Howard Thurman (his professor at Boston University) it is possible that Dr. King may have not embraced the core value of nonviolence. If it was not for Howard Thurman... Howard Thurman was Dean of Chapel at Howard University and Boston University for more than two decades, wrote numerous books, and in 1944 helped found a multicultural church: Church for the Fellowship of All Peoples in San Francisco. Thurman was born in Daytona Beach, Florida, close to my hometown, New Smyrna Beach. As a boy, I learned stories about how his opportunity to get a good education might not have happened if an “anonymous stranger” had not given him money to check his trunk on the train to Jacksonville. He graduated with honors from Morehouse College and the Colgate Rochester Divinity School. In the 1930s, Thurman had become a scholar and religious leader who traveled the world to explore religion, and in 1935 he met Gandhi. He learned about the philosophy and practice of non-violence. Thurman shared Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolence with Dr. King while King was his protégé (a graduate student) at Boston University. Thurman wrote 21 books and hundreds of sermons and articles about the connection between spiritual renewal and social change, but there was one book, JESUS AND THE DISINHERITED, that captured the heart of Martin L. King, Jr. According to some reports, Dr. King carried the book during his civil rights protests. While Dr. King acknowledged many different people as teachers and mentors, Thurman was central because of what he taught King about Gandhi’s lessons, which King later put into practice in the struggle for civil rights. If it was not for Bayard Rustin... Another important mentor to King was Bayard Rustin. Like Benjamin Mays and Howard Thurman, Rustin exposed King to the philosophy of nonviolence and the practices of nonviolent resistance, which he had observed while working with Gandhi's movement in India. Rustin recognized Martin Luther King, Jr.’s leadership and helped the civil rights leader organize the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). Rustin was a leading strategist of the civil rights movement from 1955 to 1968 and he was the chief organizer of the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. Without the 1963 march, the world may have never witnessed the, I Have a Dream Speech, which was delivered by Dr. King on August 28. In addition to his pivotal work to organize the SCLC, Rustin also influenced young activists in organizations like the Congress on Racial Equality (CORE) and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). These organization led by young people laid the foundation for the voting right movement in Selma, Alabama. While much of the new movie, Selma, focuses on the arrival of Dr. King in Selma, students were organizing for nearly three years before his arrival. Rustin rarely served as a public spokesperson for the Civil Rights Movement, but chose instead to be an influential adviser to civil-rights leaders. In the 1970s, he became a public advocate on behalf of gay and lesbian causes. On November 20, 2013, President Barack Obama posthumously awarded Rustin the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Dr. King’s life and accomplishments is one of the finest examples we have about how a leaders Emotional Intelligence (EI) contributed to the fabric of life for people in America. Long before the concept of EI was given birth, the young 15-year-old Martin L. King, Jr had the insight to be mentored by Benjamin Mays and to follow his suggestion about seeking out Howard Thurman at Boston College. Only God knows if the young Martin was consciously aware of the impact that his mentors would have on his intellectual and social-emotional development. But without his mentors, God only knows what would have become of the life of Martin L. King, Jr. As we prepare to celebrate the U. S. holiday celebrating life and legacy of Dr. Martin L. King, Jr., I urge you to consider his extraordinary thoughts within the context of mentoring:""Life's most persistent and urgent question is, 'What are you doing for others? '""""The time is always right to do the right thing. """"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. """"The function of education is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. """"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy""Is mentoring important? Can mentors shape the minds and philosophy of their protégés? Consider becoming a mentor in 2015! Go ahead and find a mentoring opportunity today. If you liked this post, I'd love it if you'd hit the ""follow"" button at the top of the page and share your thoughts about the post! Shortly after the Dr. Martin L. King, Jr. Holiday, I will publish a three part series, SELMA - Marching For the Right To Vote. Part-1 will focus on the Teachers march, Part-2 will focus on the Students march, Part-3 will focus on life today in Selma. Some of my other posts: Is America Ready For a Dialogue About Race (ism)? What Steps Can We Take To Deal With The Race Problem in America? I Can't Breathe!Why I'm Resolving to Mentor More Black Males in 2015White Privilege – It’s Real, So White Professionals Consider Mentoring a Person of Color in 2015ABOUT THE AUTHOR: I’m a health enthusiast, educator, author, psychologist, and former university professor based in the Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina area who provides professional development opportunities and workshops for teachers and parents about the best ways to motivate at-risk children. Join me on Twitter @Doctor Ernest and connect on Linked In. NOTE: All views and opinions are those of the author only and not official statements or endorsements of any public sector employer, private sector employer, organization or political entity. Sign in to like this article Sign in to comment on this article Share Follow Sign in to follow this author Dr. Ernest H. Johnson Advocate for the Equitable Education of Children of Color19 articles17 comments Newest Comment settings Sign in to leave your comment3mo Marcy Brenner Marcy and Lou at Coyote Music Den - Live Concerts and Music Lessons We need each other in this life. What have I done for others is a beautiful question. Like Sign in to like this comment Reply Sign in to reply to this comment3mo Marcy Brenner Marcy and Lou at Coyote Music Den - Live Concerts and Music Lessons Great article. Like Sign in to like this comment Reply Sign in to reply to this comment There are 15 other comments. Show more. Don't miss more articles by Dr. Ernest H. Johnson Unexpressed Anger at Home Sometimes Leads To Rage In The Workplace Dr. Ernest H. Johnson on Linked In Selma - Marching For The Right To Vote Dr. Ernest H. Johnson on Linked In Best Advice: How to Avoid Being Overwhelmed By Technology Stress Dr. Ernest H. Johnson on Linked In Looking for more of the latest headlines on Linked In? Discover more stories "


how much does a job posting cost linkedin

s. Linked In Job Posting Cost – Linked In sells a 30-day job posting for $495.00, a 5-job pack at a 20% discount, and 10-job pack at a 40% savings, but your job location cannot be edited once your job is posted.

How Much It Costs To Post A Job Online

Job Advertising How Much It Costs To Post A Job Online October 9, 2014 | Posted by Alison Hadden Subscribe to Our Blog1782Looking to post a job online quickly without having to deal with the hassle of talking with a salesperson or the commitment of a contract? Posting your jobs instantly online with a credit card for 30 or 60 days might be the best place to start. To help, we’ve gathered a breakdown of the most popular job posting sites and the cost of posting a job right now. Some refer to this online recruitment model as “post and pray” since it’s not a pay-for-performance advertising solution. But single job listings posted on a site for a set period of time for a flat fee – regardless of where the job shows up, how many interested candidates click, or what kind of results are delivered as measured by data like applicants or clicks – can be a great way to get your open position online quickly and effectively. If you’re used to paying an external recruiter upwards of $20K per hire, it may seem like a no-brainer to spend a couple hundred dollars to post a job online. Recognize, however, that with over 40,000 job boards online that come and go on a daily basis – there are a few things to keep in mind to ensure your investment is well spent. No one’s interested in sifting through hundreds or thousands of resumes if none of them even warrant a phone screen. Quality candidates are what you’re looking for, so it’s important you’re advertising in the right place. Evaluate the demographics of the job seekers on the site you’re advertising on. Are they highly educated or blue collar professionals? Active or passive job seekers? Is it a niche job board targeting engineers, nurses, or even pet groomers? Does the site only advertise hourly positions or target seasonal hires? How much traffic are they currently seeing on their site? It doesn’t matter how inexpensive a job posting is if no one ever sees it. Find out how many million users are searching for jobs on their site and whether their traffic is growing quickly or slowly declining. How long will your job be posted on their site? Many job boards offer 30 or 60 day terms. Are you tied to a monthly commitment? Is it up to you to track when your listings expire to ensure they don’t go dark? Or will the listings be auto-renewing every month on your original credit card until you remember to cancel? Comparing Job Posting Costs Glassdoor offers employers a do-it-yourself free job posting or job slot options as well. For employers looking to post more than 10 jobs, Glassdoor recommends its complete job advertising solution that helps target the 31 million members on Glassdoor who might not have your company top of mind. This can be a more effective use of recruitment budget that can deliver measurable results for companies of all sizes in as little as 90 days. Additionally, Glassdoor solutions are half the price of Linked In. Monster Job Posting Cost – Monster offers 30 and 60 day job posting options. Pricing for a single job posting on Monster for 30 days starts at $375, 60 days for $395, with discounts when purchasing in bulk. Special Offers include multiple job posting packs and the opportunity to feature jobs with bold or highlighted font. Career Builder Job Posting Costs – Single job posting pricing begins at $419 for 30 days only, with discounts ranging from 7%-58% for the advanced purchase of up to 50 jobs postings which must be used within 12 months. The single location included in a Career Builder job posting extends to a 30-mile radius. Simply Hired Job Posting Cost – Simply Hired costs $99 to sponsor 1 job for 30 days, comparable in price to other job boards. Employers can expand visibility to include Simply Hired’s partner network for $199 for 45 days and access communities on niche sites and blog

Dice Job Posting Cost – Dice caters to technical and engineering professionals with30-day single posting for $395 to as $250 for 5-10 postings. 60 Day posting and premium products require you to contact Sales. Snag AJob focuses on filling hourly positions with 30 day packages for up to 20 job postings for $89 a month. Be aware that postings automatically renew on a monthly basis with the original credit card provided unless you email or call to cancel your account during EST business hours. Craigslist charges anywhere from $25 – $75 for a 30 day posting, depending on the location selected. It’s easy to post and even easier to apply – Just be prepared for a high volume of unqualified applicants that may end up wasting lots of your time. Also, listings are posted in reverse chronological order so a job you posted two days ago might get buried and may not show up until page 8. Indeed Job Posting Cost – Indeed offers a pay per click sponsored job posting model. Your cost per click can range from anywhere from $0.10 to over $5 per click. Keep in mind this is not per candidate. You’re paying for each job seeker that clicks on your post, even if they do not submit an application. This a great platform if you’re confident in your ability to create and manage your account. If you don’t have the time to manually adjust your paid budgets or test different job descriptions and titles, then we suggest using other job posting services. Workable Pricing – Workable offers a job slot job posting and applicant tracking system that functions on a monthly subscription. Prices start at $39/month for a single job slot and go up to $399/month for up to 40 job slots. Ready to post your job? You Can Post Your Job For Free Here. Tags Budget Cost Job Postings Jobs Online Job Postings Talent Acquisition Categories Best Places to Work Customer Success Employee Engagement Employee Wellness Employer Branding Featured Gender Equality How To Use Glassdoor Industry Trends Job Advertising Job Description Know Your Worth News and Events Product Updates Small Business Talent Acquisition


what type of meals to eat for morning sickness

"Dansicker ate her way through her morning sickness with fruit, proteins -- such as peanut butter, turkey sandwiches, and meat sauce served over pasta -- and bread. ""I noticed that I vomited less and the nausea subsided when I continued to eat all day long even after and during the vomiting and nausea,"" she says.

Morning Sickness Misery

"Morning Sickness Misery Whether it's in the morning or all day long, pregnancy-related nausea and vomiting can be debilitating. Here are some ways to muddle through the misery. By Carol Sorgen From the Web MD Archives Jennifer Dansicker says the term morning sickness is a misnomer. ""It's really 'all day' sickness,"" she says. ""Six weeks of constant, undeniable, miserable nausea and vomiting . ""During Dansicker's first pregnancy, she followed all the advice that well-meaning friends and family members doled out. Crackers, bland foods, apple cider vinegar, lots of water -- but nothing curbed the nausea or stopped the vomiting. ""I stopped eating altogether and lost 15 pounds,"" Dansicker recalls. ""I was a mess. ""The next time around, Dansicker made a concerted effort to learn more about what was going on in her own body. ""I took a more scientific approach to the problem,"" she says. ""I knew that my body was producing extra hormones and that my chemical balance was out of whack because of that. So I decided to just keep eating through the nausea and the vomiting. "

Continue Reading Belowyou might like SLIDESHOWSlideshow: Fetal Development Month by Month Take a peek inside the womb to see how your baby grows and develops from month to month. She says she had more energy the second around, and the nausea didn't seem quite as bad as the last time, in part, she believes, because she was keeping her body, and in turn, her mind, strong with all the nutrients. By the end of week 13, the nausea subsided and the vomiting stopped, says Dansicker. ""I think the real key to fighting morning sickness is to eat through it with a variety of foods. It won't stop the nausea or vomiting but it will considerably help you manage it. ""Dansicker is certainly not unique in suffering from morning sickness. According to Peter Degnan, MD, director of integrated medicine at Equinox Health and Healing, in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, morning sickness affects 50%-80% of pregnant women, and a third of those experience vomiting as well. Some women report that the intensity of morning sickness-related vomiting is worse than that of chemotherapy, says Degnan. And like Dansicker herself found out, for a large majority of women with morning sickness, nausea lasts throughout the day.1 2 3 4 View All "


does highster mobile really work

Highster Mobile Highster Mobile is a very convenient application program for cell phone tracking. It is remarkable for its stealth camera and calls recording and listening to physical surroundings options among other features. Suspicious users will also find its other numerous options quite useful.

Highster Mobile

It is easy to install and works in absolutely covert mode.2.8/5 (104 reviews)User Reviews Reporting and Logging: Highster Mobile offers basic options of mobile tracking application such as call tracking. SMS and text message tracking. Allows access to all major messenger chats. It allows viewing all the media files and e-mails. Stealth camera There is address book access so that one can see the entire contact list. The application takes about several minutes to install and this is very convenient as usually there is not much time for the installation. GPS Location Tracking Feature: Highster Mobile allows GPS tracking as well so that you could see the location and movements of the cell phone on Google Maps and make sure it is where it is supposed to be. Blocking capability: Unfortunately, this application does not offer any parental control options and you won’t be able to block websites and applications nor will you be able to restrict their usage. However, it allows remote uninstall of the app. Support: In accordance to the reviews examined, the company offers real 24/7 support and they have got a live chat that functions well and you can ask them any question that would arise. Price/Quality Correlation: The price for the application is $69.99 and it is one-time fee. You will not have to pay monthly or annually or whatever else – and taking into consideration the features they offer, it can be easily considered a bargain from many points of view. Positive Features It has one-time fee. It has a basic set of options for tracking. Negative Features: There are not so many features offered. No parental control. Not all phones are supported.2fa should be disabled to get access to the data from the Apple target device. Cell Phones Supported:i Phone Android Consumer reviews can be found at trustpilot.com Conclusion: It can be considered rather inexpensive solution with all the necessary set of tracking features. It is undetectable and we have not discovered any serious faults in its operation. Visit Highster Mobile: http://highstermobile.com Highster Mobile review was updated January 12, 2018 by Top10Spy Software.com Review Team .


what does republican party support

The Democrats are more on the Left, and more support Leftist ideologies. The Republicans are more traditional, and support individual responsibility, individual freedom, and allowing the private sector to generate wealth and jobs on its own. This means lower taxes, and less social spending. And less regulation.

"Politics and Government of the United States of America Democratic Party vs. Republican Party Government in the United States of America Democratic Party (US politics)Republican Party (US politics) Government Politics of the United States of America What are the basic differences between Democrats and Republicans in American politics? Does either party support leftist ideologies?17 Answers Guyue Zhou Answered Sep 21, 2014 · Author has 159 answers and 207.8k answer views Democrat is to the left, Republican is to the right, generally speaking. The following is a list of differences, somewhat left leaning with a little exaggeration for emphasis, but all true. Excerpted from http://www.addictinginfo.org/201... (1) Republicans fear that the government has too much control over corporations. Democrats fear that corporations have too much control over our government. (2) Democrats believe it benefits all of us to help the weakest and the poorest among us. Republicans believe it benefits all of us to help the wealthiest and most powerful among us. ( 3) Republicans believe large corporations will always do what is best for the American people if the government stays out of the way. Democrats believe large corporations would disembowel you and sell your organs to the highest bidder if the government didn’t stop them. (4) Democrats believe everyone is entitled to health care regardless of their ability to pay. Republicans believe everyone is entitled to jack squat if they can’t pay for health care. (5) Democrats believe too much of our money goes to crooked corporate executives who take government subsidies and pay themselves $80 million salaries. Republicans believe too much of our money goes to teachers who make $30,000 a year. (6) Democrats believe anything that helps the American people during a recession or a time of crisis is the true essence of patriotism. Republicans believe anything that helps the American people during a recession or a time of crisis is the true essence of communism. (7) Democrats believe that we need to set high standards for clean air and drinking water. Republicans believe that standards for clean air and water are burdensome over-regulation. (8) Democrats believe the President and Congress need to work together to create jobs during a weak economy. Republicans believe that Congress should do nothing to create jobs and then blame the President. (9) Democrats believe that corporate polluters should be made to pay for the cleanup of their pollution. Republicans believe that making corporations clean up their pollution is burdensome over-regulation. (10) Democrats believe our health care system exists solely for the purpose of making people healthy. Republicans believe our health care system exists solely for the purpose of making a healthy profit. (11) Democrats believe Congress should be of the people, by the people and for the people. Republicans believe corporations are the people. (12) Democrats believe that corporations have too much influence over Congress due to their lobbyists and huge campaign contributions. Republicans believe the middle class has too much influence over Congress due to their voting and paying taxes. (13) Democrats believe we need to protect victims of corporate negligence by allowing Americans to file lawsuits against corporations. Republicans believe we need to protect large corporations from lawsuits by Americans who’ve been victimized by them. (14) Democrats believe that the rich should be taxed more than the poor and middle class. Republicans believe that the rich should be allowed to keep all their wealth, except for the millions in campaign contributions they give to politicians.33.4k Views · View Upvoters Your response is private. Is this answer still relevant and up to date?promoted by Truth Finder Have you ever googled yourself? Do a “deep search” instead. This new site reveals so much more. Enter a name and state to begin. Learn More at truthfinder.com Related Questions More Answers Below What are the differences between Republicans and Democrats? My parents are both Republican, and they want me to support that group. I don't wa... What is the difference between Democrats and Republicans in the American Political System? Do you think Donald Trump's politics are fundamentally different to that of the Democratic Party and the mainstream Republican Party? Is he un... Why is Puerto Rico not a US state? What are the differences between the Democratic and Republican Party? What are each party's beliefs? Ask New Question Aagam G Shah, Hungry For Knowledge, Analytical thinker, Data Miner, Quoraholic Answered May 24, 2016 · Author has 86 answers and 1.3m answer views The first order difference is Republicans give the benefit of the doubt (""He's OK until proven otherwise."") to other Republicans and distrust all Democrats. Democrats give the benefit of the doubt (""He's OK until proven otherwise."") to other Democrats and distrust all Republicans. Yes, it's a lot like cheering for the Dallas Cowboys or the Washington Redskins. That is, it's a group identification process, not an intellectual process. I didn't say it should be that way. The second order difference is Republicans think national defense, profits, the military, the police, and businessmen are good; and that government workers, union members, gays, drugs, illegal immigrants, most foreigners, and poor people are their enemies. Democrats are deeply suspicious of wealth, the police, the publicly religious, and people with guns. Democrats are sympathetic to poor people, people of color, any other groups that suffer from being unpopular. The second order differences provide the practical issues of politics - currently medical care for the poor and gay marriage. Second order differences are less important than first order differences. But they provide the differentiaters within a party. The third order difference is

Democrats believe that government can and should work to make everyone's lives better; and they give the benefit of the doubt to every government program that a noble purpose. Republicans believe that government screws up almost everything it touches and should be shrunk - except for the military and the police.

Republicans trust competition and business success to continually improve everyone's lives. Third order differences are mostly philosophical positions. They are used to support first order or second order positions. They are not necessarily used consistently. And they are actually less important than first or second order differences. In essence, the national parties differ significantly with the people who support them. This is largely the reason why in the primaries politicians of both parties tend to say one thing and do another once elected. In general - as others have pointed out - there is a fundamental difference in the belief of the role of the government. Democrats (in principle) believe in larger government that is able to improve the lives of their constituents - while Republicans (again - in principle) want smaller government and believes that by providing tax relief to corporations that the rising tide can lift all boats. In the extreme - Republicans believe that the role of the state (the federal government in this case) is to defend the country from foreign invaders and nothing more. Republicans are in favor of a cult of the personality for the founding fathers and ""literal"" reading of the constitutions. Democrats are more likely to admit that there is nothing mythological about our forefathers and are more likely to afford liberal interpretations of the constitution (in college, one professor I had suggested that the term Conservative and Liberal come from this distinction). In other words - ""the constitution is an immutable document - perfect and not requiring revision"" and ""the constitution was written 200 years ago, has been amended 27 times). The first thing to understand is that there are ignorant people in both parties - and in general you will find that in any large group that there are people who you might not want to associate yourself with.

There are plenty of idiot Democrats as there are idiot Republicans. On both sides - you will find people who regurgitate the party line and are people devoid of any value in the ""marketplace of ideas. ""Just as much - there are always people on both sides that are embarrassing.

For instance, I believe many Republicans do not want to associate themselves with the blowhard opinions of Donald Trump - and I myself (as someone who votes predominately for Democrats) wouldn't really want to be associated with Hilary Clinton. There is a tradition in America (at least as long as I have been old enough to comprehend politics, so - for about the last 20 or so years) that when you criticize one side that you also have to criticize the other in a ""both sides do it"" kind of way - but this part of my answer is completely genuine - and in my mind completely accurate. Republicans and Democrats both have mythologies about their party and the people who have run them over time. Democrats seem content to hearken back to the Clinton years - where they (correctly point out) that the economy grew at a fast rate. What they fail to mention is that this was due to a technology bubble that Bill Clinton had very little direct effect over and that was a tragedy once it burst. In other words, the common myth that Clinton handed Bush a perfect economy - and that Bush was responsible for wrecking it is largely incorrect (Bush essentially inherited a technology bubble that happened to burst on his watch, and also operated in an environment of weakened regulations - supported in large part by both parties - that was the cause for the housing market collapse which led to the great recession). I am certainly not absolving Bush for his sins and complicity in the matter - but he didn't nosedive a perfectly great economy in the ground - but simply exacerbated the crash of a moribund boom and bust quasi-Capitalist market system. Republicans (at least most of them recently) seem to consider Ronald Reagan some sort of saint who could do no wrong. They fiercely believe that Ronald Reagan was single-handedly responsible for the destruction of the Soviet Union - while ignoring the very unique politics and internal struggles of the Soviet Union that had little (or anything) to do with Ronald Reagan. They fundamentally misunderstand how Soviet Politics worked, and completely ignore the disaster that befell the former Eastern Block states afterwards (interestingly enough, a period of unfettered capitalism). Both sides ignore the incongruity between their saints and the professed soul of the party. That is to say - Clinton was no Liberal and Reagan would feel like he was on a different planet with the Republican party of today. This is (of course) natural on both accounts. You tend to mythologize things that make your side look good - that is to say, few Republicans get teary eyed for Goldwater while few Democrats would waste much time defending Mc Govern. Earlier - I said the words ""in principle"" because I feel its pretty apt. Republicans ultimately are not in favor of smaller government and I don't think Democrats are necessarily in favor of bigger government. In practice, both sides want the government to be more or less the same size it is now - what does differ is how they use the size of our federal government. As an aside - the blowing up of the deficit is in large part to the cutting of taxes. Think of it this way -You spend 200 dollars each week on entertainment. If your pay gets cut by 50% and you continue to spend 200 dollars on entertainment - the obvious result will be that you will have less of a surplus or (worse case) you will have to borrow to pay for your entertainment budget. Facts are facts - when Bush was elected the federal budget was not only balanced, but was actually in surplus (we still owed large amounts of money - but we weren't adding to our tab). Bush decided to put in place tax cuts - and then spent money to tell everyone that he did it - which caused a deepening of the federal deficit. With that out of the way -By in large, Republicans are more concerned with defense spending. This is (ultimately) a code word for pouring large amounts of tax payer funding into the private sector for creation of high technology industry. Anyone with even a modicum of knowledge of the history of technology would realize that the computer revolution that allows me to type this was largely the result of huge public expenditure into the private sector. As another aside - It has never ceased to amaze me that in the end the same people who are the primary beneficiaries of this public spending (namely - the tech elite of Silicon Valley) are also the most likely to be extreme libertarians who subscribe to some quasi-Ayn Rand view of the world that holds that the world would be a Utopia were it not for the evil government. Do with that what you will. Democrats on the other hand do not drastically expand government - at least not in recent history. The numbers do not lie -GOP Presidents Have Been the Worst Contributors to the Federal Debt Again - in general Democrats TEND to target what are erroneously (in my mind) called entitlements for their spending (welfare, healthcare, and social security for example). Of course, they do not usually decrease defense spending - but rather try to divert at least some (not nearly enough - and perhaps only a token amount) of the federal spending towards social programs. In practice, these can sometimes be completely wrongheaded in their approach and sometimes look exactly like what republicans would do (Bill Clinton's Welfare Reform - Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act). Another point - shot down the memory hole - is the fact that the plan Barack Obama put into place for Health Care was originally devised by REPUBLICANS in the early 90's as a counterpoint to Hilary Clinton's own view of healthcare reform. What is more important to understand is that Republicans are generally to the right of center on the normal political continuum while Democrats are (in practice) Third Way - which sadly means they basically don't have strong beliefs in anything. As Bernie Sanders ascendancy has shown, many people who are on the left side of the spectrum or are Democrats don't agree with this and have definite views to the very left of center in many cases.

Republicans take hard stances on things, while the Democratic Party generally does not. Their beliefs and attitudes change over time, and sometimes they violate the core of their own principles for various (dubious) reasons. The best exemplar again is Bill Clinton who ushered in NAFTA.

As someone from Michigan - I can guarantee you that this has made life worse in the state - already pretty miserable after Reaganomics which essentially gutted the union movement. It used to be that you could be a line worker at GM and be set for life with really great benefits - this is simply no longer the case. The result of NAFTA was that Michigan Auto Workers now competed with plants in Mexico where labor is much cheaper for a variety of reasons. The gutted auto industry is largely the fault of a supply side idea that somehow moving low-tech jobs outside of the country for the benefit of the managerial class would somehow boost demand - it didn't. In my opinion - and here I will speak exclusively about the Democrats since that is the party I am most familiar with- Democrats, or Liberals if you would prefer - tend to concentrate on the trivial. Driving a Prius that uses rare earth metals and has to be imported from Japan (pumping lots of CO2 into the atmosphere and coming with an ""original sin"" of consumption before you even hit the ignition switch) to somehow magically change the climate rather than being honest and accepting that the lifestyle we have enjoyed for the last 150 years or so needs to significantly change. The annual discussion about abortion that has been going on since the early 70's. The correct terminology for different sexual preferences. Bathrooms. Most people that I know that vote Democrat really don't care about these things. What is important is the economy - which most people in the Democratic party believe (and many Republicans apparently agree) is rigged against them. In general, people I speak to don't think their taxes are too high - but feel that it the taxes are inherently unfair given the small amounts that the wealthy elite enjoy in this country. How to solve this differs person to person and cannot be lumped into a D or R label. It is likely that the factions in each party are becoming more hardened and the parties themselves likely fall apart. There are plenty of people who are Bernie supporters who won't vote in the general election at all or not for Hilary in particular who are fed up with the ""status-quo"" of the Democratic party. On the other side - the genuine anger that drives people to vote for Donald Trump is likely to split the Republican party - a process that started with the Tea Party movement. I would strap in - its going to be an interesting few years around here -As to what party you should support - research each and understand their platforms - align yourself with whichever side seems to mirror your own feelings. It is quite likely that neither party will do this - so you call yourself ""an independent"" but still vote for the same party year after year. Just like every other person living in this country.290.3k Views · View Upvoterspromoted by Sync.com Introducing Sync.com secure cloud storage. Get your team in Sync. Secure cloud storage and collaboration for your business. Free signup. Learn More at sync.com Quora User, studied at University of Georgia Answered May 19, 2016 · Author has 95 answers and 55k answer views Although this is what I think. It is based on a significant cynicism and lack of respect for either party. Read on at your own risk. Realistically there is little difference between parties. Both are populated and controlled by people who seek power and re-election as a priority. Both try to teach voters to fear the other party and “in essence” vote for the lesser evil. Both spend more time fund raising for re-election than governing. Both want to rule the country for the benefit of themselves and wealthy donors instead of govern for the good of all people. The republicans are focused on social issues (anti LGBT, anti abortion, controlling women’s health and wealth), Democrats have no discernible focus. Which quite possibly is the only difference between the parties. Does either party support leftist ideologies? Depends on what you mean, if you mean health care and education for all, equal pay for equal work, and capitalism that works for all; then neither party supports leftist ideologies. The two Senators (there is no one in the house) I respect are Senator’s Sanders and Warren. I also respect President Obama although I give him low marks for rallying his own party and US voters to his initiatives. Given the fact he only governed for 2 years out of 7 years of his terms (republicans made him a lame duck in January) he quite likely saved this country and the world from a great depression and the US is much, much better off than when he took over in 2009.39.1k Views · View Upvoters Ujjwal Singh Answered Jan 6, 2018 · Author has 233 answers and 294.4k answer views Yes , Democrats are considered to be the party which support the leftist ideologies. Founded in 1824 , the party supports the leftist ideologies and believes in equality for all. However , over the years , the stance has changed a lot and it can’t be concluded with surety that the democrats are leftist or left-center. Coming to the differences between these parties -Over the years , the stance of both the parties have changed multiple times on various issues and the party representatives themselves came out in the open exclaiming that they don’t support the party’s ideologies on certain issues. Democratic party was founded in 1824 and Republican party was founded in 1854 and both share the same cartoonist who designed cartoons for these parties based on latest happenings , which later went on to become their national party symbols. Democratic party symbol is a donkey and Republican party’s symbol is an elephant. Democrats and Republicans differ on their traditional ideological stances on different issues. Taxes -Democrats believe that people with high income should pay higher taxes and people with low income should pay low taxes. The revenue generated by the government by this should be used by the government in social welfare schemes. Republicans on the other hand believe that all sections of the society should pay equal taxes . They have changed the tax structure which earlier had 7 tax slabs to 3 tax slabs for the society ( >225k $ | 75k-225k $ | <75k $). They believe that this may lead to a lower revenue for the government but will eventually lead to a trickle down effect as rich people would divest their money in the businesses and this would in turn create more jobs. More jobs mean income for the household who will spend this money in the market and eventually this would come into the system and lead to economic growth. Healthcare -Democrats believe that the government should have a more say in healthcare services of the country and over the years , Democrats have launched many healthcare schemes with the biggest one being Obama Healthcare which supported medical insurance for people who couldn’t afford it for themselves. The nation earlier had National Health insurance as the leader in the market. Obama Healthcare comprised of 30–40 companies which supported healthcare insurance for people who couldn’t afford it. Republicans on the other hand strongly admonish this and doesn’t believe in hefty expenditure of those 30–40 companies on public and holds Obama Healthcare responsible for inflation of prices in Healthcare sector. No wonder Donald Trump came on and removed this established system. Same Sex Marriages -Democrats believe in same sex marriages till the federal level as its their traditional ideology but over the years many democrats have come out and spoken against same sex marriages and stated that they don’t comply with the traditional views of the Democrats. Obama exclaimed that he isn’t a supporter of gay marriages. Republicans on the other hand don’t go with the same opinion. They have always opposed same sex marriages. Gun Control -Democrats believe that the age old American tradition of right to use of the gun as under second amendment of the constitution should be preserved and believe in possession of registered guns with the public. Republicans. however don’t believe in this notion and over the years they have made it clear that they don’t believe in possession of arms by general public. Government hearsay in Economy -The Democrats believe in forming a large government with a larger say in the economy of the nation. The government should intervene \ take charge of the economy. The republicans on the other hand believe in forming a small government with lesser say in the economy of the nation. They are more like capitalists and want the private sector to take charge of the economy. Immigration views differ -While republicans do believe in stronger immigration processes , they are supportive of people coming in from countries and finding their livelihood in America. Republicans on the other hand have much more diverse views on this issue and support complete ban on immigration from Muslim countries. Trump is even trying to change the H1-B visa policy and trying to amend the policy which extends the stay of working professional beyond 6 years if a Green Card registration process is underway which could directly impact Indians living in America. Over the years , both the parties have put on different stances on different issues , shifting from their traditional ideologies. Whatever the case may be , these are the two biggest dominant parties in USA.798 Views Bhimireddy Ananth Reddy, studied at KL University, Vijayawada Answered May 26, 2016 · Author has 52 answers and 97.4k answer views Comparison between Democrats and Republicans Democrats Philosophy Liberal, left-leaning. Economic Ideas Minimum wages and progressive taxation, i.e., higher tax rates for higher income brackets. Born out of anti-federalist ideals but evolved over time to favor more government regulation. Social and human ideas Based on community and social responsibility Stance on Military issues Decreased spending Stance on Taxes Progressive (high income earners should be taxed at a higher rate). Generally not opposed to raising taxes to fund government. Stance on Government Regulation Government regulations are needed to protect consumers. Stance on Immigration There is greater overall support in the Democratic party for a moratorium on deporting - or offering a pathway to citizenship to - certain undocumented immigrants. e.g. those with no criminal record, who have lived in the U. S. for 5+ years. Republicans Philosophy Conservative, right-leaning. Economic Ideas Believe taxes shouldn't be increased for anyone (including the wealthy) and that wages should be set by the free market. Social and human ideas Based on individual rights and justice Stance on Military issues Increased spending Stance on Taxes Tend to favor a ""flat tax"" (same tax rate regardless of income). Generally opposed to raising taxes. Stance on Government Regulation Government regulations hinder free market capitalism and job growth. Stance on Immigration Republicans are generally against amnesty for any undocumented immigrants. They also oppose President Obama's executive order that put a moratorium on deporting certain workers. Republicans also fund stronger enforcement actions at the border.47.5k Views · View Upvoters Anonymous Answered Oct 17, 2014What I've learned and why I'm a conservative Republican vs. a liberal Democrat, I believe in and support the following: Equal opportunity vs. equal outcomes (impossible) Free markets, capitalism, wealth generation and job creation vs. more government regulations that stifle economic growth Small government with limited role vs. big government Lower taxes for all vs. higher taxes (mainly for the wealthy) Money is best spent by those who earn it vs. money is best spent by government Privatized consumer-based healthcare vs. higher-cost, poor quality government-controlled healthcare Preserving marriage vs. redefining marriage Unborn babies' right to life vs. abortions (taxpayer-funded) Traditional American values and absolute standards of morality vs. neither Self-sufficiency and self-reliance vs. dependency, aka government handouts in exchange for votes, aka the government is your daddy Nothing is entitled to you (you must work to pay to provide) vs. everything is an entitlement (should be provided for you by someone else) Long-term government welfare programs are detrimental to the poor and therefore seek upward mobility vs. Feel there should be a social safety hammock so the poor could be more comfortable being poor Income is earned vs. income should be redistributed, class warfare Individual responsibility and voluntary charity vs. collective responsibility and coercion Hard work vs. hardly working Guns to defend ourselves vs. gun control laws that disarm law-abiding citizens trying to defend themselves against criminals that don't abide by gun control laws Ability-based admittance and employment vs. affirmative action that carries negative results (mismatching, failure) Legal immigration vs. illegal immigrants should have all of the same rights and benefits as citizens, paid for by the citizens Being charitable with our own money vs. being charitable with other people's money is better Party that abolished slavery and was pro-civil rights (party of MLK) vs. party that screams racism yet its policies hurt minorities the most Terrorism poses greatest threat to US vs. global warming poses greatest threat to US Recognize and account for women's many roles including traditional, their merit and achievements vs. women are victims of inequality Do-good policies vs feel-good policies12.3k Views · View Upvoters Winston Sullivan, Political Science Major Updated Oct 14, 2017 · Author has 147 answers and 77.1k answer views There are already good answers to this question. I will add just three things: Neither party could be considered leftist. The Democrats are largely left-of-centre, but most believe in core liberal values that are in opposition to core leftist values (e.x. individual property rights). Even Bernie Sanders, who until recently was too radical to be a member of the party, is a social democrat, not a communist, and as such a broad believer in liberal, not leftist, values The ideological beliefs of each party are subject to change over time. I, among others, have talked about these changes. The parties are also organized around sociological principles which, until recently, were more important to party identification than ideology. For example, in the early 20th century, Northerners and Westerners voted republican, while Southerners and Immigarnts voted Democrat. Later, Democrats began to dominate blue-collar workers and Republicans dominated white-collar workers. In the 1960s, Democrats gained support among Black Americans while losing support among White Southerners. Although ideology is more important today, Republicans still do better among white males than non-whites or females who hold similar positions on issues.22.5k Views · View Upvoters · Answer requested by Diego Murray Cory Shields Answered Mar 21, 2017If a republican doesn’t like guns, he doesn’t buy one. If a democrat doesn’t like guns, he wants all guns outlawed. If a republican is a vegetarian, he doesn’t eat meat. A democrat would want all meat products banned for everyone. If a Republican is gay, he or she quietly leads their life. If a Democrat is gay, he or she demands legislated respect. If a Republican is down and out, he thinks about how to better his situation. A Democrat wonders who is going to take care of him. If a Republican doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels or doesn’t watch. Democrats demand that those they don’t like be shut down. If a Republican is a non-believer, he doesn’t go to church. A Democrat non-believer wants any mention of god and religion silenced. If a Republican decides he needs healthcare, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it. A Democrat demands that the rest of us pay for his. If a Republican reads this, he’ll get a good laugh, and may even forward it to his friends. A Democrat will be offended, screech about it and try to delete it.��P9�362 Views · View Upvoters Simon Rodgers, ... at least I attempt to look at both sides before I say something. Answered Oct 10, 2016 · Author has 114 answers and 34.6k answer views Originally Answered: Whats is the basic difference between democratic and republican and American politics? There are a lot of intricacies but in general, R wants smaller Federal government (more power to the States), stricter immigration, less regulation on businesses and less financial assistance to citizens. D wants more social programs, more regulation on business, more open immigration, smaller military. So in general, R wants less government and more personal freedom. D wants bigger government with it’s fingers in more parts of peoples lives.13.9k Views · View Upvoters Linda Krueger, Soul employee Answered Sep 21, 2016 · Author has 439 answers and 146.3k answer views Politics can be very confusing especially if you get caught up in rhetoric, flip flopping of views, or if you watch too much cable news but the differences in viewpoints actually comes down to two simple concepts. 1) Group rights versus individual rights and 2) redistribution of wealth. Generally conservatives are going to be touting group rights such as their own idea of morality in order to create a version of a ‘good’ society they believe is best for all. Generally liberals are going to be for individual rights over and above group rights so that each individual’s right are important enough to not be trounced on by a group. Fiscally conservatives generally believe in individual wealth with limits on government interference on that wealth or on government expenditures that would take away from individual wealth. Social liberals believe a better society is created by sharing wealth and government has the responsibility to promote that sharing goal. What occurs with politics is that lines and definitions often get blurred and muddled which leads to the confusion of who is who on what topic. For example the Republicans promote conservative goals surrounding morals in society with issues such as birth control access and religious objections to gay marriage but then fight gun laws that would limit individual freedom. Liberals fight for individual freedom on one hand but then attempt to mold society on the other. This muddling is what ends up making things difficult to label any partiy in a precise way and it is the reason the parties seemingly change places throughout history. But if each current issue is looked at on its own you can see the issue breakdown to a case of group rights versus individual and how best to redistribute the goods or wealth in society. Confused? Then each election time turn off the TV and download the entire party platform for each party running and actually read through its often very lengthy text. Based on that you will get the best idea of what each party is currently focusing on, what positions they are backing, and what their intended goals are if their party has enough power to get their way.7.8k Views · View Upvoters · Answer requested by Diego Murray Shawn Standiford Answered Jan 8, 2017A New York Times article recently tried to explain why rural America voted for Trump. At one point a Christian pastor boiled it down to this: Republicans believe humans are inherently bad. Democrats believe humans are inherently good. ( Log In - New York Times )If you can’t log in to NYTimes, you can still basically extrapolate what this means. It means that all of the policy decisions made could be said to stem from this fundamental difference. While there are Christians who are Democrats, it is widely held that Repubs are more likely to be Evangelical Christians, who hold the worldview that humans are born fallen and must be governed by a Higher Power. Democrats, in general, believe humans are born perfect and do not need a Higher Power to govern them. They need humans in qualified positions of advantage to govern them. Volumes could be written about the pastor’s comments and what it means for Americans. Right now we are in full Repub swing, and the policy decisions being made follow along.5.2k Views · View Upvoters John Lesko, Attorney, College-Level Political Science Instructor, studied Political Science Answered Sep 21, 2016 · Author has 145 answers and 46.1k answer views

The Democrats are more in favor of change, and focus more on equality. That means more social spending, which requires higher taxes. They also favor more regulation, for environmental, economic, and social equality reasons. Basically, Democrats favor a larger government, while Republicans generally prefer a smaller government. Republicans have also favored a more assertive foreign policy since WWII, while the Democrats have been somewhat more pacifistic, especially since Vietnam.5.9k Views · View Upvoters · Answer requested by Diego Murray Ryan Bickel, lives in The United States of America Answered May 14, 2017At the most basic level, Democrats tend to be more consequentialist than Republicans, they believe that “the ends justify the means.” Take abortion for example. The Democrat argues that the mother would have to live a worse life, possibly drop out of college or quit her job, if the baby is born. They believe, therefore, that it is moral for the baby to be aborted, as it is better than the alternative. Republicans, on the other hand, see killing the baby as immoral, therefore it should not be killed, regardless of the consequences. The same applies to taxation. Democrats believe that the services provided by taxation are better than the act of stealing the money in the first place. Therefore, taxation is not “theft,” to them, as it is justified by the consequence. Generally, Democrats value positive freedom rather than negative freedom. They want the freedom to do what they want, not freedom from people like the government. This also ties in with the their consequentialist worldview, as they see any action to obtain this positive freedom as morally just. Welfare, for example, steals money from the rich to give to the poor so the poor can be free to do what they wish. Republicans see negative freedom as the gateway to positive freedom by getting the government out of the way and allowing the people to do what they wish.1.4k Views · View Upvoters Trudy Grill, former Sales/Consultant (1963-1995)Answered Mar 30, 2017 · Author has 230 answers and 30.3k answer views At one time neither party would ever even think of having leftist ideologies. Yet during the Obama administration (Democratic party) I continued to see more and more government take over or so called Socialistic type of governing. Many States saw exactly as I did .. States that were strictly Democratic turned to Republicans in hope “America would be great again!” A “ divided “ country will never stand alone but this was exactly what the Obama administration counted on and it happened . Hopefully the Trump administration can put this country back together. Democrats were always for the working middle class and Republicans were always for Big business. Obama in order to get elected down right lied to American citizens on what he promised them and passed many laws that no one even knew about. Those same people turned from strong democrates to strong republicans. I am not a political educated person. I am just an average American citizens so I'll let the professions continue on your question it is just my view point…796 Views · View Upvoters · Answer requested by Maieul Chevalier Quora User, Full-Stack Software Developer and Entrepreneur Answered Oct 25, 2017 · Author has 689 answers and 146.1k answer views Without diving into the details of every plank in the respective Party’s Platforms, I can sum it up in the following statement. Republicans care more about money than people and Democrats care more about people than money. Its really that simple. Republicans use lies, manipulation, voter suppression, and gerrymandering to win. While standing by silently as fascists destroy democracy. All in the hope of calling an Article V Convention and rewriting the Constitution to make the United States into an Evangelical Christian Nation ruled by wealthy hypocrites. In other words Republicans want a plutocracy. Which explains the statement, 'I just don't want a poor person'Trump: 'I just don't want a poor person' running the economy1.3k Views · View Upvoters Jaylan Richardson, Political views advocate Updated Oct 29, 2016 · Author has 90 answers and 44.1k answer views Democrats:1. Decreased military spending.2. Belief in collectivism .3. Belief in higher tax rates.4. Against gun rights (some disagree).5. Believe in abortion (some disagree). Republicans:1. Increased military spending.2. Belief in individualism .3. Belief in lower tax rates .4. Pro gun rights ( some disagree).5. Believe in pro life ( some disagree).7.4k Views · View Upvoters Maria Filina Answered Nov 2, 2017 · Author has 111 answers and 14.7k answer views I do not have much knowledge of politics and parties, but there is always a struggle between these parties. Remember the election in 2016? The whole world still discusses this desperate confrontation. I even found a game called Free Online Political Game Electoral. Io in which you need to choose a party, collect votes and money and absorb opponents. When you figure out the difference between the views of parties, you can safely play for the side you like in the game and real life :)594 Views Related Questions Politics of the United States of America: When did African American voters primarily switch from supporting Republicans to supporting Democrat... Are political parties necessary? Why are Democratic Party and Republican Party the major political parties in the US? How do Democratic-Republicans differ from Federalists? What are the basic differences between Democratic and Republic party? Why do Democrats and Republicans caucus differently? What political party does Puerto Rico usually support on the federal level, Democrats, or Republicans? What was the Democratic Republican party? Why do Asian Americans tend to vote Democratic? Who owns the Democratic and Republican parties? Ask New Question Related Questions What are the differences between Republicans and Democrats? My parents are both Republican, and they want me to support that group. I don't wa... What is the difference between Democrats and Republicans in the American Political System? Do you think Donald Trump's politics are fundamentally different to that of the Democratic Party and the mainstream Republican Party? Is he un... Why is Puerto Rico not a US state? What are the differences between the Democratic and Republican Party? What are each party's beliefs? Politics of the United States of America: When did African American voters primarily switch from supporting Republicans to supporting Democrat... Are political parties necessary? Why are Democratic Party and Republican Party the major political parties in the US? How do Democratic-Republicans differ from Federalists? What are the basic differences between Democratic and Republic party? Ask New Question In other languages En français : Quelles sont les différences fondamentales entre les démocrates et les républicains dans la politique américaine ? Est-ce que l'une ou l'autre des deux parties appuie les idéologies de gauche ? "